<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview With Weakonomics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onemint.com/2009/06/02/interview-with-weakonomics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onemint.com/2009/06/02/interview-with-weakonomics/</link>
	<description>Helps You Make Better Financial Decisions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:03:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.onemint.com/2009/06/02/interview-with-weakonomics/comment-page-1/#comment-20992</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 09:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemint.com/?p=1878#comment-20992</guid>
		<description>A great interview, thanks.

I have a similar point of view (I was a UK bank insider until the end of 2007) and can tell the same story: there was a &quot;groupthink&quot; that residential (and commercial) property would keep rising in value indefinetely - it didn&#039;t matter if a borrower defaulted on their loan as the bank could easily resell the property and clear the debts.  EVERYONE was responsible: bankers wanted their bonuses, shareholders wanted more dividends and ever increasing capital growth, home owners and property investors (speculators may be a better word) wanted more and more growth, the Government were happy to collect more taxes from the illusory growth, and we all kept borrowing (either against property or on credit cards etc).  TV programmes, newspaper articles and dinner party conversations all said that you were mad if you didn&#039;t borrow as much as possible (insane amounts) to invest in property! The &quot;bubble burst&quot;, &quot;the wheels fell off&quot;, but the Government and the banks have learnt nothing and just want to get the same mad process going again.

I suspect that the USA is rushing to do the same.  More regulation won&#039;t help if the drive from the top is to print money, lend more get a real estate boom going!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great interview, thanks.</p>
<p>I have a similar point of view (I was a UK bank insider until the end of 2007) and can tell the same story: there was a &#8220;groupthink&#8221; that residential (and commercial) property would keep rising in value indefinetely &#8211; it didn&#8217;t matter if a borrower defaulted on their loan as the bank could easily resell the property and clear the debts.  EVERYONE was responsible: bankers wanted their bonuses, shareholders wanted more dividends and ever increasing capital growth, home owners and property investors (speculators may be a better word) wanted more and more growth, the Government were happy to collect more taxes from the illusory growth, and we all kept borrowing (either against property or on credit cards etc).  TV programmes, newspaper articles and dinner party conversations all said that you were mad if you didn&#8217;t borrow as much as possible (insane amounts) to invest in property! The &#8220;bubble burst&#8221;, &#8220;the wheels fell off&#8221;, but the Government and the banks have learnt nothing and just want to get the same mad process going again.</p>
<p>I suspect that the USA is rushing to do the same.  More regulation won&#8217;t help if the drive from the top is to print money, lend more get a real estate boom going!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moneymonk</title>
		<link>http://www.onemint.com/2009/06/02/interview-with-weakonomics/comment-page-1/#comment-20900</link>
		<dc:creator>Moneymonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemint.com/?p=1878#comment-20900</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed reading this, nice interview</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed reading this, nice interview</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Luxing</title>
		<link>http://www.onemint.com/2009/06/02/interview-with-weakonomics/comment-page-1/#comment-20804</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Luxing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemint.com/?p=1878#comment-20804</guid>
		<description>Great interview. I especially like the portion where he explains that everyone can point a finger at another person to blame. It really shows how deep this problem has gone to the heart of the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great interview. I especially like the portion where he explains that everyone can point a finger at another person to blame. It really shows how deep this problem has gone to the heart of the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the weakonomist</title>
		<link>http://www.onemint.com/2009/06/02/interview-with-weakonomics/comment-page-1/#comment-20799</link>
		<dc:creator>the weakonomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 02:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemint.com/?p=1878#comment-20799</guid>
		<description>Thanks Manshu!  This was awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Manshu!  This was awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manshu</title>
		<link>http://www.onemint.com/2009/06/02/interview-with-weakonomics/comment-page-1/#comment-20787</link>
		<dc:creator>Manshu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemint.com/?p=1878#comment-20787</guid>
		<description>@MoneyEnergy: Yeah, if they are doing their job well and not short changing others -- no one is going to mind them. I think the interview turned out really well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MoneyEnergy: Yeah, if they are doing their job well and not short changing others &#8212; no one is going to mind them. I think the interview turned out really well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoneyEnergy</title>
		<link>http://www.onemint.com/2009/06/02/interview-with-weakonomics/comment-page-1/#comment-20769</link>
		<dc:creator>MoneyEnergy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemint.com/?p=1878#comment-20769</guid>
		<description>Nice interview.... good perspective on thinking about banks as car dealerships.  I&#039;m not sure how true that is in Canada - i.e., I don&#039;t think that even the tellers stand to make a direct profit off of doing something with you (like commissions, etc.) But certainly if you call in on the telebanking line, there are people there always wanting to offer you new products.  A bank is definitely a business.  That&#039;s why I like their dividends!:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice interview&#8230;. good perspective on thinking about banks as car dealerships.  I&#8217;m not sure how true that is in Canada &#8211; i.e., I don&#8217;t think that even the tellers stand to make a direct profit off of doing something with you (like commissions, etc.) But certainly if you call in on the telebanking line, there are people there always wanting to offer you new products.  A bank is definitely a business.  That&#8217;s why I like their dividends!:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
