<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would you fire me?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onemint.com/2009/06/11/would-you-fire-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onemint.com/2009/06/11/would-you-fire-me/</link>
	<description>Helps You Make Better Financial Decisions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:26:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.onemint.com/2009/06/11/would-you-fire-me/comment-page-1/#comment-27613</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemint.com/?p=1975#comment-27613</guid>
		<description>Amazing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AK</title>
		<link>http://www.onemint.com/2009/06/11/would-you-fire-me/comment-page-1/#comment-27611</link>
		<dc:creator>AK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemint.com/?p=1975#comment-27611</guid>
		<description>Stock market is nothing it’s a glass of liquid

Stock market is nothing it’s a glass of liquid; Size of the glass depends upon economy of a country &amp; its development which can be higher or lower in size.

Different color cocktail with various flavor are the generator of this glass.
Flavor provides attraction of its test which increases &amp; decreases its size &amp; test with quality, time and sucking capacity of an individual.

Individual needs basic &amp; require utilities with right time to suck the best test of flavor.

Cocktail is a needy, innocent, and cruel motility as per its size, situation &amp; time.

It always requires the participation of small &amp; big suckers to make it huge in size with daily, monthly and yearly basic by so many ways, parallel it provides sucking chances to its participators of good &amp; bad test.

 Cocktail making &amp; duplicity are the parasites to create huge hole in the glass.

When size of the cocktail is very small then it shows its desperate neediness &amp; ready to whisper any participators because it’s always being with so many parasites.

Suddenly bunches of big suckers come with sucking passions by their all the tools to participate enormously because here they can wait until their desire wont be fulfilled.
When some neat small suckers see the big ones then they start to be with them &amp; the size of cocktail initiates to climb up &amp; demonstrate its extreme innocence to welcome all other suckers to suck the beauty of its test.

Timely some smart “big &amp; small” suckers test the beauty of youthful cocktail &amp; start to wait for another needy time. This makes some variations in the size of cocktail but its manufacture &amp; treachery set up to hide the facts about real test by the grace of positive “artificial &amp; natural” situations. This is called the ballooning the hole of liquid. Due to this bulk of small suckers come for the contribution.

In this period of time some more suckers book their good &amp; bad test &amp; cocktail starts to reach a place between innocence and cruelty &amp; so many fairyland stories start to begin and spring its magic among new comers. 

Suddenly groups of very big suckers swallow the large part of cocktail then all the air of glass hole have gone out &amp; cocktail reaches in its cruel age.

All the small new suckers stun to see the size of cock tail &amp; they feel that test is very bad they have to wait until it will resize again but its going to down very frequently &amp; their waiting has become an everlasting journey for them. Those addictive suckers were sucking the cocktail from needy time to upper innocence time suddenly they find that their participation is completely balanced or negative as compare to their joining time.

Sucking capacity is not depend upon the cocktail size in the glass it completely depends on the chances of getting cocktail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stock market is nothing it’s a glass of liquid</p>
<p>Stock market is nothing it’s a glass of liquid; Size of the glass depends upon economy of a country &amp; its development which can be higher or lower in size.</p>
<p>Different color cocktail with various flavor are the generator of this glass.<br />
Flavor provides attraction of its test which increases &amp; decreases its size &amp; test with quality, time and sucking capacity of an individual.</p>
<p>Individual needs basic &amp; require utilities with right time to suck the best test of flavor.</p>
<p>Cocktail is a needy, innocent, and cruel motility as per its size, situation &amp; time.</p>
<p>It always requires the participation of small &amp; big suckers to make it huge in size with daily, monthly and yearly basic by so many ways, parallel it provides sucking chances to its participators of good &amp; bad test.</p>
<p> Cocktail making &amp; duplicity are the parasites to create huge hole in the glass.</p>
<p>When size of the cocktail is very small then it shows its desperate neediness &amp; ready to whisper any participators because it’s always being with so many parasites.</p>
<p>Suddenly bunches of big suckers come with sucking passions by their all the tools to participate enormously because here they can wait until their desire wont be fulfilled.<br />
When some neat small suckers see the big ones then they start to be with them &amp; the size of cocktail initiates to climb up &amp; demonstrate its extreme innocence to welcome all other suckers to suck the beauty of its test.</p>
<p>Timely some smart “big &amp; small” suckers test the beauty of youthful cocktail &amp; start to wait for another needy time. This makes some variations in the size of cocktail but its manufacture &amp; treachery set up to hide the facts about real test by the grace of positive “artificial &amp; natural” situations. This is called the ballooning the hole of liquid. Due to this bulk of small suckers come for the contribution.</p>
<p>In this period of time some more suckers book their good &amp; bad test &amp; cocktail starts to reach a place between innocence and cruelty &amp; so many fairyland stories start to begin and spring its magic among new comers. </p>
<p>Suddenly groups of very big suckers swallow the large part of cocktail then all the air of glass hole have gone out &amp; cocktail reaches in its cruel age.</p>
<p>All the small new suckers stun to see the size of cock tail &amp; they feel that test is very bad they have to wait until it will resize again but its going to down very frequently &amp; their waiting has become an everlasting journey for them. Those addictive suckers were sucking the cocktail from needy time to upper innocence time suddenly they find that their participation is completely balanced or negative as compare to their joining time.</p>
<p>Sucking capacity is not depend upon the cocktail size in the glass it completely depends on the chances of getting cocktail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manshu</title>
		<link>http://www.onemint.com/2009/06/11/would-you-fire-me/comment-page-1/#comment-21483</link>
		<dc:creator>Manshu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemint.com/?p=1975#comment-21483</guid>
		<description>@Mark: I wish I had thought like you. 

@Mikael: I had to think on three too, but in the end I came to the conclusion that I would fire me too. If you can&#039;t trust a fellow, you shouldn&#039;t do business with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark: I wish I had thought like you. </p>
<p>@Mikael: I had to think on three too, but in the end I came to the conclusion that I would fire me too. If you can&#8217;t trust a fellow, you shouldn&#8217;t do business with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikael @ Retire Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.onemint.com/2009/06/11/would-you-fire-me/comment-page-1/#comment-21447</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikael @ Retire Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemint.com/?p=1975#comment-21447</guid>
		<description>I would definitely fire you on all three but I agree that I had to think about &quot;C&quot;. luckily for me I haven&#039;t even seen the Harvard story mentioned so I didn&#039;t point my fingers at them in the first place (I pretty sure I wouldn&#039;t have if I had seen it).

Being ethical is very important to me because I am a firm believer of do onto others what you want them to do onto you ;)

Mikael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely fire you on all three but I agree that I had to think about &#8220;C&#8221;. luckily for me I haven&#8217;t even seen the Harvard story mentioned so I didn&#8217;t point my fingers at them in the first place (I pretty sure I wouldn&#8217;t have if I had seen it).</p>
<p>Being ethical is very important to me because I am a firm believer of do onto others what you want them to do onto you <img src='http://www.onemint.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Mikael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wolfinger</title>
		<link>http://www.onemint.com/2009/06/11/would-you-fire-me/comment-page-1/#comment-21305</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wolfinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onemint.com/?p=1975#comment-21305</guid>
		<description>A is my fault for not watching closely

B Too many investors don&#039;t know when their trusted advisor is doing badly.  But yes, I&#039;d fire you for losing too much money

C is the worst of all.  Knowing your motives, I&#039;&#039;d fire you, tell your boss, report you to the SEC.  I would not keep you, hoping you can continue to trade profitably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A is my fault for not watching closely</p>
<p>B Too many investors don&#8217;t know when their trusted advisor is doing badly.  But yes, I&#8217;d fire you for losing too much money</p>
<p>C is the worst of all.  Knowing your motives, I&#8221;d fire you, tell your boss, report you to the SEC.  I would not keep you, hoping you can continue to trade profitably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

