Yash Birla has a Swiss Account, what next?

PTI reported today that industrialist Yash Birla, along with four other lesser known businessmen hold Swiss bank accounts as confirmed by the Switzerland authorities.

This news apparently delighted the finance minister who chalked this to successful diplomacy and cooperation between the Modi government and the Swiss government.

Almost all news articles I read talked about Yash Birla as if he were guilty already, and I was unsure as to what the charges were.

It seemed at first that holding a Swiss account that wasn’t disclosed to the Indian IT authorities is what these individuals did wrong, but if that were the case then I wasn’t sure why the Swiss decided to release these five names only. Surely, a lot more than five Indians hold Swiss accounts. Also interesting is the timing of the release because the Indian government does complete a year today, and this timing is rather perfect for them.

Deutsche Welle which is an international German newspaper also reported the story, and had a little more breadth to their reporting because of the international angle that the Indian papers lacked.

DW reports the following:

Switzerland has begun online publication of names of foreigners and foreign firms wanted in tax probes by their countries of origin, including Germany. American citizens are identified only by their initials.

So, from this piece of information you can gleam out that the reason why these names are published is that the Indian authorities have specifically asked for certain individual names from the Swiss stating that the Indian government is investigating these individuals for tax frauds.

The second big question is why the Indian government asked about some individuals specifically, and the article refers to names from the stolen list that became popular some time ago.

So, to that effect these names were present in a list of people who used to have Swiss accounts at one point in time, and now that the Swiss Authorities have confirmed that these people did in fact have Swiss Accounts at one point or the other — I imagine the Indian authorities will encourage these individuals to voluntary declare their incomes under the new Black Money Act and pay the fines per the new regulations.

I assume that Indian authorities will do that because there is still a very long way to go for India to actually get any details of how much money is there in these Swiss accounts or in fact if there is any money at all present there.

Would the people named in the stolen list have done nothing during this time?

And if there is no balance there presently, will the Swiss be willing to share where that money went? I wouldn’t bet my money on that.

I would like to see how this progresses and in fact if the IT department is able to do anything with just this confirmation since it doesn’t actually tell you the amount of money in the account, and I can’t imagine much being done without that information.

Also, if you haven’t read about this at all yet, this is a good article that will catch you up with the parts I assumed you have read already.

Update: An official spokesperson of Yash Birla Group has said that Yash Birla has no individual bank account in his name or in his control.

Modi’s India – How will the next few years fare?

In the past few days whenever I’ve thought of PM Modi’s first year – the thought of President Obama’s two terms have also come to mind.

The strong parallels between the two are inheriting a really bad economy, and coming to power with a lot of fan fare, hope and optimism.

The other parallel is that both made campaign promises that could never be delivered for such is the nature of campaign promises.

I think it is a reality of politics that things said during campaigns are akin to stretch goals that can hardly ever be met. For instance, I don’t think anyone seriously thought Congress could spend a trillion dollars on infrastructure which is something they promised during their campaign. However, the nature of the two campaigns made people expect that a lot will be delivered.

Things have gradually improved in the US under President Obama, and US has probably had the best recovery of any nation after the Great Recession. This didn’t always seem to be the case, and in fact a lot of people will still disagree with the statement that the US has in fact benefitted from his presidency even now.
Agriculture is the backbone of India!!!
I believe that things have gradually improved under PM Modi as well and while they have taken some bad steps like pushing a Land Bill which is unfair to the landowner , not doing enough to allay investor fears on retrospective taxation, or playing with the idea of making people disclose foreign travel on their income tax forms, they have taken some good steps as well, and perhaps the most significant among them are delivering a scam free year, and moving legislation on various issues which are all work in progress.

They are obviously aided by external factors (fall in commodity prices) like they have been hampered by external factors (bad monsoons) but on the whole – the government is functioning, and that unfortunately is the only bar they had to cross since the last government screwed up things so badly.

I believe that under the current administration, aided and hindered by external factors as well as the federal government structure, and a vociferous opposition — the country will continue to do much better than it did in the ten years of the previous government’s rule. This will always be less than what Modi promised during this campaign but unless things change dramatically, it will always be more than what Congress can deliver under Rahul Gandhi, and therefore I feel Modi will get a second term much like Obama, and at the end of the decade, when you look back you will see that things are better than they were at the beginning of the decade even if they aren’t as good as you expected them to be.

What is the definition of a heat wave and how do people die of it?

The heat has been particularly merciless in the last few days, and the reports of hundreds of people dying due to the heat wave is quite saddening.

Unfortunately, this is nothing new; every year people die of the heat wave in the summers, and of the cold wave in the winters.

In the winters there are visible efforts to protect people from the cold wave with the government setting up shelters and NGOs pitching in as well, and whatever the shortcomings of these efforts, one can only imagine that the fatalities would be a lot higher if nothing were done.

However, the efforts to protect people from the heat wave aren’t as apparent and it made me wonder who decides when a heat wave is caused and how do people actually die of it?

5
How is heat wave defined in India?

The answer to the first question is clear — heat wave in India is defined by the Indian Meteorological Department, and this definition can be found in the website of the National Disaster Management Authority.

The Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) has given the following criteria for Heat Waves:

  • Heat Wave need not be considered till maximum temperature of a station reaches atleast 40*C for Plains and atleast 30*C for Hilly regions
  • When normal maximum temperature of a station is less than or equal to 40*C Heat Wave Departure from normal is 5*C to 6*C Severe Heat Wave Departure from normal is 7*C or more
  • When normal maximum temperature of a station is more than 40*C Heat Wave Departure from normal is 4*C to 5*C Severe Heat Wave Departure from normal is 6*C or more
  • When actual maximum temperature remains 45*C or more irrespective of normal maximum temperature, heat waves should be declared. Higher daily peak temperatures and longer, more intense heat waves are becomingly increasingly frequent globally due to climate change. India too is feeling the impact of climate change in terms of increased instances of heat waves which are more intense in nature with each passing year, and have a devastating impact on human health thereby increasing the number of heat wave casualties.

The second question: How do people actually die of the heat wave should be very easy to answer, but I didn’t find a very convincing answer to it.

While state officials report how many people died of heat in their states, it is not clear what their source of information is and how they categorize a death as a death due to a heat wave. One would imagine this is important if you had any hope of fighting such deaths.

However, from what I read — the two most probable causes of deaths due to heat waves are homelessness and laborers getting sunstroke in the heat.

Interestingly enough, Telangana and Andhra Pradesh which have seen the majority of these heat wave related deaths have rescheduled government services like the NREGS (Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme) because the heat is causing sun stroke among the laborers working under the scheme. It is not clear how many people have died due to this but if the number is significant enough to reschedule the scheme then this should act as a lesson for the future as well as for other states as well and there ought to be some rules that stop people from working under such schemes when the temperature goes beyond a certain level.

Homelessness seems to be the other prominent cause of deaths and while there are no official reports that I could find of them this year, there are reports from previous years that mention Delhi Police statistics on unidentified bodies they find of homeless people and the most probable cause of their death does seem to be the heat.

The temperatures are changing permanently, and it is reported that the heat wave so far has claimed about 445 lives in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana which are the worst hit states. There is urgent need to take this issue seriously, and understand the causes, and potential actions that can be taken to save lives in the future.

Will the gold monetization scheme help me if I don’t want to melt my gold?

Short Answer: No.

Long Answer:

I wrote about the gold monetization scheme last week, and a common question on that (presumably from people who haven’t read the post) is what if I don’t want to melt my gold?

If you don’t want to melt the gold then this scheme is not for you. The most important requirement of the scheme is that they should be able to melt your gold, and keep it with them so that they can use it for their lending purposes. The gold is of no use to anyone if it can’t be lent out, and it certainly can’t be lent out in the form of grandma’s bangles.

A semi related question then is if you have to melt the gold then how different is this from just selling your jewelry to your family jeweler and then investing that money in a gold ETF. You can avoid all of the hassles that comes from having to visit the hallmarking bureau, getting your gold melted, opening a bank account etc.

Gold Bar with Reflected Coins
Gold needs to be melted under the Gold Monetization Scheme

I think this is an interesting question, and one that is answered by looking at gold in two different ways — one for investment, and one for personal consumption.

If you buy jewelry then that’s gold for your consumption and use, and you wouldn’t normally think about selling it and to that extent the gold monetizations scheme is not going to magically put that money to work, and you gain nothing out of the family jewelry you’ve got.

However, a lot of people do buy gold on Dhanteras, other festivals, or just generally accumulate it as part of their investment strategy, and this scheme is certainly very useful to those people in those specific cases.

If you plan to buy gold through a gold ETF or a gold mutual fund then this can prove to be an interesting alternative to that because the tax angle on this is very favorable, and not only do you benefit from gold appreciation you benefit from interest as well.

Gold ETFs are a part of most investor’s portfolio, and the gold monetization scheme may potentially create a good competitor to that in terms of an electronic gold investment option which can be converted into physical gold at your demand, which is something the gold funds can’t do at the moment.

Bronze age woman has a giraffe in her freezer

I’ve read a lot of interesting articles and opinions about Modi’s one year, and I am sure a lot of you have also done that so instead of posting links to more – I’ll post an article by my favorite economist on what needs to be done to get to 8.5% growth. 

Very interesting article on how US is publicly challenging China’s moves in disputed waters. 

Fascinating piece about the life and movement of a bronze age woman.

Twitter, Facebook, Instagram – all of these are tools in your hands, and whether you waste time on them or make something out of it is entirely up to you. Read about 22 year old Ms. Bernstein who charges up to $15,000 for an Instagram post. 

I had no ideas how giraffes sleep, or indeed how little they slept.

I have sadly thrown away a lot of stuff from my freezer without realizing how long it can last there. This little infographic from Real Simple is very helpful.

Finally, a great article on the evolution of snakes. Enjoy your weekend!

How to skip rows in an Excel formula?

There is nothing more frustrating in MS Excel and Google Spreadsheets than their inability to recognize a pattern in referenced cells.

For example, if you type 1, 3, 5 and 7 in four cells and then drag them down, Excel knows that the next in series is 9, 11, and 13 etc.

However, if you type =B2, =B4, =B6 and =B8 in four cells and then drag them down, Excel does not know that the next in line should be =B10, =B12, =B14 and so on.

 

excel skip rows when referencing

 

Even Google Spreadsheet doesn’t do this and I don’t know if this is a feature or a bug but I’m leaning towards a bug, as I’ve felt the need for this many many times, and although there are workarounds to do this I haven’t seen any really easy ways to do it until recently.

After breaking my head on the Offset function for a few hours today I started searching for a new solution to do this and stumbled upon this neat find and replace trick to skip rows while using them in a formula.

What you do is instead of typing =B2, =B4, =B6 and =B8 in four cells and then dragging them down, type something like $B2, $B4, $B6 and then drag it down. Excel will correctly populate the series for you now.

After that all you have to do is select your cells and find and replace the dollar sign with the equal sign to convert the cells into a formula and voila — you have the correctly referenced cells.

Find and Replace

 

This is one of the most useful Excel tricks that I’ve ever come across, and I’m really amazed at the simplicity and the effectiveness of this. Anyone who has tried to do this using round about ways will realize how much time this will save, and how useful this is becase there are just countless times that you need to skip rows while using them in an Excel or a Google Spreadsheet formula.

Details of the Draft Gold Monetization Scheme

The Finance Ministry published a draft on the Gold Monetization Scheme that the finance minister had spoken about during the recent budget.

The big idea behind gold monetization is that India produces almost no gold and imports massive amounts of it — up to a thousand tons a year — this leads to a big trade deficit, and if there were some way to channelize the idle gold lying with households and temples etc. that would go a long way in helping this hole.

The idea is definitely very good, and I’m sure all of us have jokingly discussed this at one point or the other. The difficulty lies, as it always lies, with the execution.

To that extent, I think the ministry has come out with a good first draft although I think right now this idea is more beneficial to temples etc. than it is to households.

I say that because in order to put your gold to work you have to agree to have it melted, and in general you won’t find many households who are willing to have their gold melted even if it promised them an interest. The interest is not likely to be very high for these schemes, and at one or two percent per year, I just don’t see many families doing that.

Religious institutions however are a different kettle of fish altogether, and I do believe that a lot of them will eventually take a pragmatic stance on this, and monetize their gold. Eventually is the key word here because this has never been tried before and it will take time to gain acceptance of the idea. Most readers will remember the skepticism surrounding gold ETFs in the early days, but now it finds its way in the portfolio of most investors.

For those who are willing to have their gold melted, here is a brief overview of how the process is going to work.

  1. You take your gold to a purity testing center and they will tell you how much pure gold there is in your ornament.
  2. If you agree to go forward, your jewellery will be stripped off studs etc. – anything which is not gold, and then melted down to pure gold.
  3. Now they tell you the purity and weight a second time, and you can either accept that and deposit your gold, or take back the melted bars.
  4. If you accept it and deposit the gold then you will be given a certificate of the purity and quantity of the gold and no fee will be charged for melting. In this case the bank pays the melting fees. You don’t get your gold back in this case.
  5. Next, you take this gold certificate to a bank and they open a Gold Savings Account for you.
  6. Bank pays you interest as well as principal in gold.
  7. You live happily ever after.

The government is going to exempt the interest income as well as any gains in principal from Wealth Tax, Capital Gains as well as Income Tax. So, to that extent, the tax angle on this is extremely good.

The process described in the draft document shows that it will take you about a couple of days to do this and the cost will be about a thousand rupees or so. Right now, there aren’t those many centers and of course you have to wait and see how many banks open this kind of account. The other big variable is the interest rate, and how much interest can the bank really gives out on these type of deposits.

I don’t think this scheme is going to be very popular with households in its current form, not unless the rate of interest is very appealing, but I do believe it is a great first step in what could really put to work tons of gold lying idle in India’s religious institutions.

Thoughts on the India – China MOUs

The China pitstop has perhaps been the most interesting in our globe trotting PM’s itinerary. The beginning wasn’t as exciting for its substance as it was for its selfie opportunities, and even though a couple dozen government to government MOUs were announced, it is hard to get excited about an agreement between Doordarshan and China Central Television Corporation or even a yoga college in China.

The primary criticism I saw of these MOUs was that these were nothing more than a framework to do something sometime in the future, and most of them don’t translate into anything tangible, and it does seem that this criticism is fair.

Another criticism has been the lack of progress made on difficult issues like border disputes, China flexing its muscle in the Indian Ocean, stapling visas on residents of Arunachal Pradesh, building roads in POK and I believe nothing revealed in public gives any reason to think that China is rethinking any of its moves in those directions.

Finally,  the issue of India’s increasing trade deficit with China which is to the tune of $38 billion dollars last year was also brought up but this is one area where I think talks are not going to help much. The trade deficit exists because there is an imbalance in the manufacturing capabilities of the two countries, and China is much better at manufacturing than India, and as long as that remains true there will be an imbalance. This is a problem whose solution lies inwards, not external.

There was however one tangible piece of action, and that was with the announcement of the commercial contracts which are estimated to be around $22 billion and are to be executed between Indian and Chinese companies.

They have substance, and the list of the MOUs shows that they include varied companies and sectors, and I feel that this is a very good outcome for the visit.

The most interesting aspect of this investment is that it is of a somewhat equal nature unlike most other big announcements that come out of China.

I say equal to mean that this is not simply the case of Chinese companies building infrastructure in a foreign country which is usually how these things are but rather a mix of investments from Indian companies in China like Wipro or Infosys, investments from Chinese companies in India in partnership with Indian companies like the solar power co-operation between Welspun and Trina Solar, and financing deals like the one Bharti got from China Development Bank.

Contrast this to the $46 billion investment that China pledged to Pakistan recently to build infrastructure in that country, or the $50 billion China recently announced to spend in Brazil and the difference is clear.

To take the Brazilian example, look at this excerpt from the BBC article about this. 

China is planning to invest up to $50bn (£32bn) in Brazil for new infrastructure projects.

The deal is due to be signed by banks from both countries during a visit by Chinese Prime Minister Li Keqiang to Brazil next week.

The money will go towards building a railway link from Brazil’s Atlantic coast to the Pacific coast of Peru to reduce the cost of exports to China.

I believe the deals that Indian companies have signed are a positive outcome, and should translate into meaningful progress in the next few years. The scale is big enough to make a difference, and the nature of these transactions are such that they keep India on an equal footing with China with respect to these deals.

Warm blooded fish gets tax demands while watching British TV shows

Let’s start this week with an excellent article from the Economist on the dawn of artificial intelligence. AI is advancing in leaps and bounds, and there are some prominent people who worry that it might lead to the end of us.

A sad state of affairs – CAG assesses that the Indian army will run out of ammo in just twenty days if there were intense fighting.

British TV shows are usually a great watch, here is a short list.

China has built a prototype of a train that is three times faster than an airplane.

Something we all inherently know but don’t do anything about – email is a bigger distraction than we admit to ourselves.

I really liked this article about recent tax demands from Indian authorities.

Finally, Scientists discover the first warm blooded fish. 

Enjoy your weekend!

 

Can the Black Money Bill affect you directly?

Rajya Sabha cleared the Black Money Bill today, which is officially Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets (Imposition of Tax) Bill, 2015, and this is perhaps the only piece of legislation which the Congress finds itself unable to oppose.

The finance minister had first talked about this Bill earlier in the year, and the bill has been introduced to bring back black money stashed overseas and to that extent you don’t normally think a regular white collar workers with all their money in white will have any direct impact by it.

The draft itself talks about an exemption up to a limit of Rs. 5 lakhs in reporting foreign assets or money, but that is not very much money, and a lot of people who may have worked abroad for any length of time may have a lot more than that on which taxes have been paid in the foreign country.

The existing income tax laws require you to disclose your foreign assets and income in your tax filing but that is recent change and something that has not been really enforced yet. The IT form itself has space to make this disclosure, but not many people have been doing it.

7027608495_daeb33feb7_z

Photo: Tax Credits

This is pertinent because there is no clear definition of ‘undisclosed income’ and while the intent of this bill is not the small fish, I think you can easily interpret undisclosed income to mean money in your foreign accounts that have not been declared in Indian IT forms.

This issue was raised by the opposition and a clarification was given on it by the finance minister, who said the following:

“we don’t want to proceed against trivial violations. But then the big fish must not get away in the garb. “Let us not fire from the shoulders of these innocent students in order to make sure that no harsh action is taken on the big fish itself.”

I believe I’m not alone in my fears of harrassment as there have been reports that corporates have also expressed these same fears.

However, there have been amendments to the original bill which are not public as far as I know that do safeguard companies and individuals against such harrassment. Specifically, Livemint reported these things that I think are very important: 

The government also approved amending the bill to curb tax evasion within India at a cabinet meeting held on Wednesday…

…Students and non-resident Indians and professionals working abroad will not be covered under the black money bill. “Only resident tax payers who are liable for assessment under income-tax act and those who spend more than 182 days in India will be under the ambit of the bill,” he said.

When the Act is available, I will read it and do a follow up post, but as of today, it doesn’t seem like there is a real threat that the Black Money Bill can be used for harrassment of regular folks.