IRFC Tax-Free Bonds Issue Details

This post is written by Shiv Kukreja, who is a Certified Financial Planner and runs a financial planning firm, Ojas Capital in Delhi/NCR. He can be reached at skukreja@investitude.co.in

Indian Railway Finance Corporation Limited (IRFC) will be the next company to launch its tax-free bonds this financial year from January 21st. The company plans to raise Rs. 1,000 crores from this issue with an option to retain oversubscription up to Rs. 8,886.40 crores.

This will be the second such issue by IRFC as the company issued tax-free bonds last year also. The issue will close on January 29th, coincidently on the same day on which the RBI is scheduled to announce its monetary policy.

Investors who want to invest in these tax-free bonds for their higher effective yields, I think this is the last such opportunity this financial year. I am saying this because IRFC was among those few companies which filed their final prospectus in December when the yield on the 10-year government securities was higher at around 8.15-8.20%. It has fallen by 35-40 basis points (or 0.35-0.40%) since then.

As the interest rates offered by these companies are linked to the benchmark government securities, the upcoming tax-free bond issues are going to offer lower rate of interest and hence, will be very unattractive.

As most of these tax-free bonds are quite similar in their regular features, here are some of the unique features of this issue:

Interest Rate

IRFC is offering 7.84% per annum for its 15-year option and 7.68% per annum for the 10-year option to the retail investors investing up to Rs. 10 lakhs. Again, the additional incentive of 0.50% will be payable to the original allottees only who invest in these bonds during this offer period. In case these bonds are sold or transferred by the original allottees, except in case of transfer of bonds to legal heir in the event of death of the original allottee, the coupon rates will be revised downwards to the base coupon rates.

As with all of these issues, the interest rate for the other categories of investors, like QIBs, corporates and HNIs, will be 0.50% lower than the above rates offered to the retail investors. For 15 years, it will be 7.34% per annum and for 10 years, it will be 7.18% per annum.

NRI Investment: Like HUDCO tax-free bonds, NRIs can also invest in this issue, but only non-US based NRIs. They can apply for these bonds both on repatriation basis as well as non-repatriation basis. Eligible NRIs can use their NRE/NRO/FCNR/NRNR/NRSR account to invest in this issue but will be required to get a bank certificate made to confirm that the money has been used out of an NRE/NRO/FCNR/NRNR/NRSR account. If the NRI is a Person of Indian Origin (PIO), then it is mandatory to attach the copy of the PIO card.

Other Terms of the Issue

The issue is secured in nature and has been rated ‘AAA’ by CRISIL, ICRA and CARE. The bonds will get listed within 12 working days post closure of the issue on both the national exchanges, National Stock Exchange (NSE) and Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE).

Like its first issue last year, IRFC has fixed October 15th as the interest payment date for this issue as well. The investors have the option to apply for these bonds either in the demat form or physical form and thus, demat account is not mandatory to apply for these bonds.

40% of the issue is reserved for the retail investors, another 20% of the issue is reserved for the high net worth individuals (HNIs) i.e. for the individual investors investing above Rs. 10 lakhs. 20% of the issue is reserved for the institutional investors and the remaining 20% is for the corporate investors.

The minimum amount of application is Rs 5,000 with face value of Rs 1,000 per bond. The allotment will be made on first-come-first-serve basis.

About IRFC

Indian Railway Finance Corporation Limited (IRFC) is a wholly-owned public sector undertaking (PSU) and works as a financial arm of Indian Railways. It is also registered with the RBI as Infrastructure Finance Company-NBFC (IFC-NBFC). IRFC has strong asset quality zero gross and net non-performing assets (NPAs) as on March 31, 2012.

The proceeds raised from the issue will be utilised by the company towards financing the acquisition of rolling stock that will be leased to the Ministry of Railways and for funding other projects approved by the Ministry of Railways.

As mentioned above, interest rates have fallen by around 0.35-0.40% in the last few days and going by this trend, the upcoming issues of tax-free bonds will offer lower rate of interest. As much anticipated, if the RBI decides to cut interest rate this time on January 29th, the bond yields should fall more from these levels.

So, it is highly recommended now for the investors in the higher tax brackets to use this opportunity to invest their money either in the ongoing HUDCO tax-free bonds which offer the highest interest rates or in this issue which is rated higher at ‘AAA’.

Click here to download the application form

Offer For Sale (OFS) – Process Explained

This post is written by Shiv Kukreja, who is a Certified Financial Planner and runs a financial planning firm, Ojas Capital in Delhi/NCR. He can be reached at skukreja@investitude.co.in

A few days ago when the CARE IPO was about to get opened, Rakesh got confused about the “Offer for Sale” process through which the share sale was to happen. He wanted to know whether the procedure to apply for CARE shares was to be same like normal IPO or something different.

To know more about it, TCB asked me to share the process details.

TCB
December 19, 2012 at 7:50 am
Dear Shiv,Can you please give details about the procedure for Offer For Sale (OFS) of Hindustan Copper, ONGC, NMDC etc. ? As you correctly said, this OFS is different from CARE Offer For Sale.I would like to know details like how to apply, how & when to pay, how & when is allotment done, what is the meaning of terminologies like indicative price, during the offer from where can we monitor the quantity and price of bids received etc.Thanks

Here is my attempt to let people understand the Offer for Sale process. Please leave your comments in case I miss something or you find any discrepancy in the post.

Poor economic growth causes poor investment sentiment which results in poor market conditions and thus forces corporates to cost cutting. In another attempt to save some unnecessary costs and to reduce the time taken to raise money, SEBI has introduced a new process called Offer for Sale (OFS).

Offer for Sale is getting really popular with the companies and as many as eight companies, like NMDC, Hindustan Copper, Eros International, Blue Dart, Honeywell Automation etc., have taken this route to either raise money from the markets or to increase non-promoter shareholding in order to comply with the minimum public shareholding guidelines.

What is “Offer for Sale” and can retail investors participate in the process?

Offer for Sale (OFS) is another form of share sale, very much similar to Follow-On Public Offer (FPO). OFS mechanism facilitates the promoters of an already listed company to sell or dilute their existing shareholdings through an exchange based bidding platform.

Except the promoters of the company, all market participants like individuals, mutual funds, foreign institutional investors (FIIs), insurance companies, corporates, other qualified institutional bidders (QIBs), HUFs etc. can bid/participate in the OFS process or buy the shares. The promoters of the company can only participate as the sellers in the process.

OFS Process

First of all, very basic, you need to compulsorily have a demat/trading account(s) and permanent account number (PAN) to participate in an Offer for Sale. The sellers are required to deposit the offered shares with the exchange before 11.00 a.m. on T–1 day, where ‘T’ is the day of OFS.

Once the OFS starts, you can participate in the process yourself using your online trading accounts like ICICI Direct, Kotak Securities etc. by placing your bids under the ‘OFS’ section of their respective broking websites.

Investors, who do not have online trading accounts, can place their bids by directing the dealer of their broking company to do it on their behalf. You can modify or cancel your bids during the offer timings except in the last 60 minutes i.e. till 2:30 p.m.

The exchange will announce the “Indicative Price” only during the last 60 minutes of the OFS. Indicative Price is the volume weighted average price of all the valid/confirmed bids. e.g. There are total 1000 shares in an offer for sale with Rs. 200 as the floor price. If the investors bid for 200 shares at Rs. 210 and 800 shares at Rs. 200, the indicative price for the offer would be [(200*210)+(800*200)]/1000 = Rs. 202.

No leverage is provided to the investors against the stock margin available in the trading accounts and thus, they are required to deposit 100% of the order value in cash to bid for it. Also, the funds allocated for OFS cannot be utilised for other investment purposes or against any other obligation of the trading member.

Once the bidding gets over, allotment price is fixed and allocation is done. The successful bidders will be allotted shares directly into their demat account on T+1 basis the very next day. In case of partial allotment or no allotment, the refunds will be made on the same day itself. This makes the OFS process really fast, just like buying shares of the company from the open market.

During the offer timings or once the offer gets completed, you can monitor the quantity and price of bids received etc. from this link of NSE, like it has the details of the OFS of Eros International Media Limited which got concluded on December 20th.

Allocation Methodology and Contract Notes

The companies can adopt one of the two methodologies for allocating the shares on offer i.e. either on a price-priority basis at multiple clearing prices or on a proportionate basis at a single clearing price.

Like you get the contract notes by the evening of the trading day on which you buy shares of a company, you’ll get a contract note in the same format when you buy shares in an OFS. Contract note will have the details of your bid price and the quantity allotted in the specified format.

What differentiates Offer for Sale (OFS) process from IPOs/FPOs?

Physical Application: Unlike IPOs/FPOs, no physical application forms are issued to apply for shares in the OFS process. OFS process is completely platform based.

Time Period: While IPOs/FPOs remain open for 3-4 days, OFS gets over in a single trading day as the markets gets closed for trading at 3:30 p.m.

Price Band: Under IPOs/FPOs, there is a price band in which the investors need to bid for the shares or simply give their consent to buy the shares at the “Cut-Off” price. With OFS, there is a “Floor Price”. As the name suggests, it is the minimum price at which you can bid for the shares under OFS. You will not be able to place an order below the floor price as it will not be accepted by the system.

Though it is not mandatory to disclose the floor price before the issue opens, the promoters usually disclose it prior to the share sale in almost all of the issues. Alternatively, the promoters can submit the floor price in a sealed envelope to the exchange which will be disclosed post closure of the offer. In case the floor price is not disclosed to the public, the investors can place their bids at any price they want.

Charges: Investors are not required to pay any kind of charges over and above the ‘Fixed Price’ in an IPO or FPO. But, the OFS process involve certain transaction charges including the brokerage, Securities Transaction Tax (STT) and other charges, which the investors normally pay when they buy shares of a company in the cash market.

On the OFS day, normal trading in the shares of the company will continue even when the bidding process is ‘ON’. The investors have the option to either buy the shares of the company in the normal market or place their bids for the shares on sale in the OFS. The investors can place only ‘Limit’ orders under the OFS facility as ‘Market’ orders are not allowed.

OFS process has the following advantages over FPOs/IPOs:

Cost effective: I think this is the biggest reason for the promoters to sell their stake through the OFS route. OFS route involves very less formalities. Unlike IPOs/FPOs, the promoters of the issue under OFS are not required to file Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP). Also, there is no need to get the application forms printed. It also saves big advertisement expenses.

Saves Time: This route involves sale of shares in a single trading day and that too, during the normal trading hours i.e. between 9:15 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. The promoters can announce their intention of share sale even one trading day prior to the opening of the offer.

Transparency: Retail investors have suffered losses in the past due to manipulation in IPO/FPO allotment. OFS process is quite transparent as it is done on real-time basis with a system based bidding platform and involves least amount of paperwork.

Multiple Orders: Under OFS, there is no restriction on number of bids from a single buyer. This facility is not available in FPOs/IPOs.

The formats are changing rapidly. One-day cricket is fast losing its appeal to T-20 matches. Similarly, 3-4 days long FPOs are getting replaced by these single-trading day Offers for Sale. Very few people read the DRHP or printed details on application forms while investing. So, in a way, these OFS will reduce the issue costs to a large extent. But, will the investors be able to make wise investment decisions in these OFS? Just wait and watch.

New “Basis of Allotment” Explained with CARE IPO

This post is written by Shiv Kukreja, who is a Certified Financial Planner and runs a financial planning firm, Ojas Capital in Delhi/NCR. He can be reached at skukreja@investitude.co.in

CARE IPO, which closed on December 11th, got oversubscribed by 34.11 times. After a very long time an IPO has seen such a good response from all the categories of investors. There was a huge appetite for its shares from Qualified Institutional Investors (QIBs) and Non-Institutional Investors (NII) categories, which saw oversubscription to the tune of 43.31 times and 110.24 times respectively.

Retail investors were a little cautious but some of them got interested to apply for it. This category got oversubscribed by 6.11 times. CARE has now become the third rating agency to get listed after CRISIL and ICRA.

CARE IPO – Explaining Basis of Allotment to Retail Individual Bidders

CARE IPO had total 71,99,700 equity shares on offer in the IPO, at an issue price of Rs. 750 per share. 35% of the offer was available for allocation to the retail individual bidders in accordance with the SEBI Regulations, which makes it 25,19,895 equity shares.

As many of you must be aware, when the investors apply for a company’s shares in an IPO, there is a bid ‘lot’ system. With CARE IPO, the bid lot size was in multiples of 20 shares and the retail investors had the option to apply for a maximum of 13 lots (260 shares) and a minimum of 1 lot (20 shares). So, the minimum investment in the CARE IPO was Rs. 15,000 and Rs. 1,95,000 as the maximum.

In August this year, SEBI announced certain new measures regarding “Basis of Allotment”. Some of the important measures are:

* Every retail participant gets a minimum bid lot irrespective of his application size. This is subject to availability of shares.
* The minimum application size band in an IPO has been increased from Rs. 5,000-7,000 earlier to Rs. 10,000-15,000 now.
* Issuers are now allowed to furnish the price band five working days prior to issue opening date as against the erstwhile two working days.

So, this new system of allotment, which got used in the CARE IPO also, has left many of the retail investors disappointed, including me.

Retail investors have been allotted only 20 shares irrespective of their application size i.e. whether they applied for 20 shares or 260 shares or any number of shares in between, they got only 20 shares allotted. That too, in the ratio of 101:256 i.e. only 101 applicants got these 20 shares out of 256 applicants.

Actually, a total of 3,19,350 retail individual applicants applied for it, in varying number of bid lots i.e. between 1 to 13 bid lots and only 1,25,994 applicants got the shares allotted in the ratio of 101:256.

Allocation to Retail Individual Bidders (after technical rejection)

As you can check the Basis of Allotment in the table above, there were 2,45,680 applicants who applied for 20 shares with each of their applications. Out of these 2,45,680 applicants, 96,929 applicants have been allotted 20 shares each or total of 19,38,580 shares.

2,45,680 * 101/256 = 96,929 * 20 shares = 19,38,580

Similarly,

15,853 * 101/256 = 6,255 * 20 shares = 1,25,100
9,199 * 101/256 = 3,629 * 20 shares = 72,580

and so on.

If you want to check the manual of CARE allotment, you can do so from this link.

I was disappointed as out of my family members’ 4 applications, we got allotted only 20 shares. There have been many investors like me who are disappointed. But, the disappointment in the allotment is primarily due to non-awareness of the new system.

If the new system is analysed deeply, it is not that bad after all. I think the idea is to encourage and favour the small retail investors and also to discourage HNIs to take the retail category route to apply for higher number of shares.

At the same time, it creates uncertainty in the minds of the retail investors whether to apply for an IPO or not, as you never know whether you will fall in those 1,25,994 successful applicants or not.

With the new system in place, the retail investors will have to change their strategy to get maximum number of shares allotted in some popular IPOs like CARE i.e. they should now apply for minimum bid lots in popular IPOs and increase the number of applications using demat accounts of their family members.

ELSS – Equity Exposure + Tax Savings = Deadly Combination in a ‘Down’ Market

This post is written by Shiv Kukreja, who is a Certified Financial Planner and runs a financial planning firm, Ojas Capital in Delhi/NCR. He can be reached at skukreja@investitude.co.in

A few days back I was watching CNBC-TV18 in the morning when the markets were about to start trading. Udayan Mukherjee and Mitali Mukherjee were talking to Prashant Jain about his expectations from the stock markets in 2013. Let me tell you Prashant Jain is the Chief Investment Officer of HDFC Mutual Fund and the fund manager of two of HDFC MF’s most popular schemes, HDFC Top 200 and HDFC Equity Fund, among others.

Let me also tell you that I try to regularly follow Prashant’s thoughts on investment environment and earnings expectations.

He shared his views that the markets are trading at a forward Price/Earnings (P/E) multiple of 13.5 to 14.5 times, based on the FY14 Sensex earnings per share (EPS) of Rs. 1350 to Rs. 1450, which is below the average P/E multiple of 17 times. As per him, the retail investors always lose money in the stock markets because of their poor timings of entering and exiting the stock markets.

He further said that it is unfortunate but the stock markets always get retail investors’ investments when the P/E multiples are on a higher side, say above 17-18 times and they always cut their holdings when the markets just start their journey to newer highs and the P/E multiples are on a lower side, say around 13-14 times.

If you analyse the current markets scenario when the Sensex has risen past 19000 levels, many of the investors are doing exactly the same what Prashant is suggesting. On the one side, they are either redeeming their mutual funds or surrendering the mis-sold ULIPs or cutting their holdings in stocks/booking profits too early. On the other side, they are increasing their asset allocation towards the debt/gold instruments like fixed deposits, tax-free bonds, NCDs, Gold ETFs etc.

Some investors think that if the markets have risen from 16000-17000 levels to 19000-19500 levels, it is better to sell their investments in mutual funds or shares as the markets will again fall to sub-17000 levels due to some reason and these stocks will again take 2-3 years to reach these levels.

Is this a prudent investment strategy to earn above average market returns? Definitely Not. It is next to impossible to predict the definite direction of stock markets. A common investor should invest in the markets when the markets are cheap and continue investing till the markets remain cheap. When to sell? The answer is very simple – when the markets are expensive or the P/E multiples are above reasonable levels, say above 20-22 times.

But honestly speaking, it is very difficult to follow it practically because when the markets become expensive, the growth in EPS is very strong and we get driven away by some rosy pictures getting published daily in the newspapers. Also, our greed grips us so strongly that we are just not able to book profits.

So, when the markets are down, it offers a very good opportunity for the investors to invest in direct equity or equity linked investment products. Moreover, if any of these instruments provide you an additional tax benefit u/s. 80C also along with completely tax-free returns on maturity/redemption, I think it makes it a perfect investment for most of the investors.

As per a CRISIL report published earlier this year, it showed that Equity Linked Savings Schemes (ELSS) have been better investment options than PPF, NSC etc. It showed that these schemes delivered an average annualised returns of around 22% in the last 10 years. PPF at present earns 8.80% per annum for you and that is also tax free at maturity.

The table below shows a comparison between ELSS and PPF. With similar returns of 8.80% and 22%, your Rs. 1 lakh invested today in PPF and ELSS would become Rs.2,32,428 and Rs. 7,30,463 respectively after 10 years.

Some good performing ELSS have delivered very good returns in the past 1 year period. But, I think investors should also observe their long-term performances. The table below shows the list of five such schemes with their 3-year and 1-year performances.

With a lock-in period of 3 years, I think tax saving mutual funds (ELSS) as a category should outperform all other tax saving products in the next 3-5 years. But, for that, the corporate profitability should improve and the government should start taking steps in the right direction. Lets see how these funds deliver in the times to come.

PFC Tax Free Bonds Review

This post is written by Shiv Kukreja, who is a Certified Financial Planner and runs a financial planning firm, Ojas Capital in Delhi/NCR. He can be reached at skukreja@investitude.co.in

Power Finance Corporation (PFC) will be launching the second public issue of tax-free bonds this financial year (FY 2012-13) from the coming Friday, December 14th, 2012. The company plans to raise Rs. 1,000 crore in this issue with an option to retain oversubscription to the tune of Rs. 3,590 crore, making the total size of the issue to be Rs. 4,590 crore.

PFC plans to use the proceeds for company’s lending purposes, debt servicing and
working capital requirements, subject to the terms and conditions of the CBDT Notification.

Details of the Issue

Categories of Investors

As with all these issues, the investors would be classified in the following four categories:

Category I – Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs)
Category II – Non-Institutional Investors (NIIs) or Corporates
Category III – High Net Worth Individuals (HNIs)
Category IV – Retail Individual Investors (RIIs)

40% of the issue is reserved for the retail investors, another 20% of the issue is reserved for the high net worth individuals (HNIs) i.e. for the individual investors investing above Rs. 10 lakhs. 25% of the issue is reserved for the institutional investors and the remaining 15% is for the corporate investors.

Rate of Interest/Coupon Rate

There is not much difference between this issue and the REC bonds issue which closed on Monday, December 10th. PFC will pay a base coupon rate of 7.36% and 7.19% per annum to the Category I, II and III investors with a maturity period of 15 years and 10 years respectively.

As with the REC bond issue, PFC will also pay an additional coupon of 0.50% p.a. to the retail investors over and above the base coupon rate, making it 7.86% and 7.69% per annum respectively. Interest will be payable annually as there is no cumulative interest option.

But, the additional incentive of 0.50% will be payable to the original allottees only who invest in these bonds during this offer period. In case these bonds are sold or transferred by the original allottees, except in case of transfer of bonds to legal heir in the event of death of the original allottee, the coupon rates will be revised downwards to the base coupon rates.

The interest earned will be exempt from tax under section 10 (15)(iv)(h) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Retail investors can invest up to Rs. 10 lakhs in the issue and still get the additional coupon of 0.50%. The company has decided to keep the minimum investment requirement of Rs. 5,000 (or 5 bonds of face value Rs. 1,000).

Listing, Safety and other features of the Issue

Demat account is not necessary to invest in these bonds. Investors have been given the option to apply these bonds in physical form also. Like last year, PFC bonds are going to list only on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE).

NRIs and foreign nationals among others are not eligible to invest in this issue. The allotment will be made on a “first-come-first-served” basis.

The issue has been rated ‘AAA’ by CRISIL and ICRA. The issue is secured in nature and in the event of default, the bondholders can claim a charge upon the assets of the company in connection with these bonds.

The issue will close on December 21st, 2012. The bonds will get allotted and listed within 12 working days from the closing date of the issue.

How 7.86% is fixed and will the forthcoming tax-free bond issues carry higher rate of interest?

This financial year, there is a ceiling on the coupon rates these companies can offer based on the reference Government Securities (G-sec) rate. The coupon rate for ‘AAA’ rated issuers cannot be more than the reference G-sec rate minus 65 basis points (bps) or 0.65% in case of retail investors and G-sec rate minus 115 bps or 1.15% in case of QIBs, corporates and HNIs.

The reference G-Sec rate is the average of the base G–sec yield for equivalent maturity reported by the Fixed Money Market and Derivative Association of India (FIMMDA) on a daily basis prevailing for two weeks ending on the Friday immediately preceding the filing of issue’s prospectus with the designated stock exchange and the Registrar of Companies (RoC).

So, if the 10-year benchmark G-sec rate is 8.17% p.a. payable semi-annually, the reference G-sec rate would be equal to (((1+(0.0817/2))^2) – 1) * 100 = 8.34% p.a. Hence, 65 bps less than 8.34% p.a. is 7.69% p.a. payable annually.

Keeping this ceiling and slow economic growth into consideration, I do not think the future tax-free bond issues would be able to carry a higher rate of interest. In fact any interest rate cut by RBI due to an unexpected and further fall in economic growth would force the issuers to lower their coupon rates.

About Power Finance Corporation Limited

Power Finance Corporation is a listed Government of India undertaking with 73.72% stake held by the govt. The company provides financing to state electricity boards (SEBs), state generating companies and independent power producers (IPPs) for a range of power-sector activities including generation and distribution.

Performance of the PFC tax free bonds issued last year

Tax free bonds issued last year have given quite handsome returns to the investors in the range of approximately 15%-20% annualised. PFC tax free bonds closed at Rs. 1,086.10 on December 11th, 2012 carrying a YTM of 7.43%. These bonds paid a mid-year interest also on October 15th, 2012.

Given the current YTM of 7.43%, the rate of interest of 7.86% or 7.69% is still attractive for the retail investors in the 30% or 20% tax bracket with medium-term to long-term perspective.

REC has got a good response for its bond issue from the retail and HNI investor categories, probably because it was the first issue of these popular tax-free bonds. The timing of PFC issue is interesting as the RBI will be announcing its next monetary policy measures on December 18th. In case there is a rate cut by RBI, then the issue will become quite attractive for the retail investors and they can expect an appreciation in the market price of these bonds.

Click here to download the application form

Should you book profits in last year’s tax-free bonds to invest in new tax-free bonds?

This post is written by Shiv Kukreja, who is a Certified Financial Planner and runs a financial planning firm, Ojas Capital in Delhi/NCR. He can be reached at skukreja@investitude.co.in

I was reading an article a few days back which had the headline “Why one should book profit in existing tax-free bonds and invest in new issues” and a couple of financial experts shared their views that investors should book profits in the existing tax-free bonds and invest the sale proceeds in the new issues like the currently running REC tax-free bonds.

Sanjay Shah raised a similar query here yesterday. This is what he had to say:

Sanjay Shah December 3, 2012 at 5:33 am

Hi Manshu / Shiv,

I had been allotted 1,000 bonds of REC in it’s March 2012 issue. Period is 15 years carrying an interest of 8.12% (HNI category). It’s currently listing at a premium of 9%. Given that I am in the 20% tax bracket and that the sale of the REC bonds will mean profits earned will be added to my income, plus 0.5% brokerage charge, do you recommend I sell those and re-invest in this issue? (and thus replace myself in the Retail category).

Additionally, I had been allotted 336 bonds of PFC in it’s February 2012 issue. Period is 10 years carrying an interest of 8.2% (HNI category). It’s currently listing at a premium of 6%. Given that I am in the 20% tax bracket and that the sale of the PFC bonds will mean profits earned will be added to my income, plus 0.5% brokerage charge, do you recommend I sell those and re-invest in this issue? (and thus replace myself in the Retail category, plus net a 15 year bond instead of a 10 year bond).

I had invested in the earlier bonds with a view of keeping them till end of tenure and the same holds true this time as well. However, I don’t have enough funds to remain invested in all three issues and hence need to decide if I should shift which series I am invested in.

Thanks in advance.

Here is what Manshu had to say in response:

Manshu December 3, 2012 at 7:11 am

Based on your situation I don’t see any value in selling and shifting to a lower interest bearing bond. If anything, the decline in interest rates will mean that the premium on your existing bonds go up even more.

Here is what I had to say in response:

Shiv Kukreja December 3, 2012 at 4:45 pm

Hi Sanjay… If I were at your place, with funds limited for two investments only, I would have kept my investments in the old tax free bonds only. This is because of two reasons – first, if you sell your old bonds in the markets now, you’ll have to pay STCG tax on the capital gains made till date as per your income tax slab. Second, the market value for these new bonds would be as per the yield to maturity (YTM) for the new buyer and not as per 7.88% or 7.72%.
But, if you can manage to hold your old bonds for 2-4 months more till your investments complete one year and you also manage to buy and hold the new bonds till their maturity, then probably it makes sense to try replacing yourself in the Retail category. This would result in a YTM of 7.88% or 7.72% for you. Am I clear to you or was it too complicated?

Taking from there, I have a view that if you are in 30% or 20% tax bracket, it is not a great idea to invest in this year’s tax-free bonds with the proceeds from the sale of last year’s tax-free bonds. Firstly, you will have to pay short-term capital gain (STCG) tax as per your income tax slab. So, your returns would effectively get reduced by the STCG tax you pay and also by the brokerage you pay when you sell your existing bonds.

Secondly, as all new issues will carry the “Step Down” feature and the buyers of these bonds in the secondary markets will not get the additional coupon rate of 0.50% per annum, these new tax-free bonds will always trade at a market price factoring into the reduced coupon rate.

Also, as Manshu pointed out, the decline in interest rates will mean that the premium on your existing bonds go up even more. This is because the existing REC tax-free bonds are already trading at a higher yield to maturity (YTM) of 7.49% as compared to the original coupon rate of 7.38%. So, if the yields of both these bonds are equal, then either the old tax-free bonds will appreciate in value or the new tax-free bonds will fall in value.

In what situation or when should you book profits in the old tax-free bonds?

1. If an investor wants to book profits, he/she should do that either after completion of 1 year from the date of allotment or after the next ex-interest date. Investors in the 30% or 20% tax bracket can save their tax outgo by selling these bonds after a year and pay only 10% flat long-term capital gain (LTCG) tax on these listed bonds. Moreover, the market price of these bonds fall two days before the ex-interest date. So, one can sell these bonds after this date to minimise their tax outgo.

2. If you are 100% certain that you will hold these bonds for more than 7-10 years, then also you might think of selling the existing bonds. But, there would not be extraordinary gains out of it.

Many of the brokers might encourage you to sell your existing investments in tax-free bonds to invest in the new tax-free bonds. I would say you should do your homework first and your objectives must be clear before you follow your broker.

Tax Free Bonds Notification 2012 – 13

This post is written by Shiv Kukreja, who is a Certified Financial Planner and runs a financial planning firm, Ojas Capital in Delhi/NCR. He can be reached at skukreja@investitude.co.in

Many of the investors have been waiting for the tax-free bonds to be issued during 2012-13. In the annual budget in March this year, the former Finance Minister, Pranab Mukherjee, had proposed tax free bonds to the tune of Rs. 60,000 crore for the companies in the infrastructure development or infrastructure finance space.

After waiting for more than seven months, the wait seems to be coming to an end. The notification for the tax free bonds for financial year 2012-13 has been released by the Ministry of Finance on tuesday, November 6th. Here is the Taxmann link to the notification.

NHAI, IRFC, PFC, REC and HUDCO have been allowed to issue these bonds again this year and IIFCL, NHB, JNPT, Dredging Corporation and Ennore Port will be the new entrant issuing these bonds this year. These bonds will be issued for 10 years, 15 years or 20 years. IIFCL is the only company among the ten companies which has been allowed to issue these bonds for 20 years.

Like it is done in most of the bond issues, the investors would be classified in the following four categories:-

1) Retail Individual Investors (RIIs)
2) Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs)
3) Corporates
4) High Net Worth Individuals (HNIs)

Most importantly, the definition for the “Retail Individual Investors” has been modified. As per the notification, Retail Individual Investors would mean those individual investors, Hindu Undivided Families or HUFs (through Karta), and Non Resident Indians (NRIs), applying for upto Rs. 10 lakhs in each issue. Individual investors investing more than Rs. 10 lakhs will be classified as High Net Worth Individuals (HNIs).

Last year, the limit for the retail investors was Rs. 5 lakhs and if you remember, REC had set the limit at Rs. 1 lakh earlier and then reset it back to Rs. 5 lakhs when the issue got a poor response on the first day of its offer period in the retail investors category.

Like last year, there would be an applicable ceiling on the coupon rates offered by the issuer companies, based on the reference Government security (G-sec) rate. The ceiling coupon rate for ‘AAA’ or ‘AA+’ rated issuer companies will be 65 basis points (or 0.65%) less than the reference G-sec rate in case of Retail Individual Investors and 115 basis points (1.15%) less than the reference G-sec rate in case of other investors like Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs), Corporate and High Net Worth Individuals (HNIs).

In case of issuer companies having credit rating of ‘AA’ or below, the ceiling coupon rate will be 50 basis points less than the reference G-sec rate in case of Retail Individual Investors and 100 basis points less than the reference G-sec rate in case of other investors.

Retail investors would be eligible to a higher rate of interest to an extent of 50 basis points. The higher rate of interest, applicable to the retail investors, will not be available in case the bonds are transferred, except in case of transfer to legal heir in the event of death of the original investor.

As per the notification – “The reference G-sec rate would be the average of the base yield of G-sec for equivalent maturity reported by Fixed Income Money Market and Derivative Association of India (FIMMDA) on a daily basis (working day) prevailing for two weeks ending on Friday immediately preceding the filing of the final prospectus with the Exchange or Registrar of Companies (ROC) in case of public issue and the issue opening date in case of private placement”.

Last year, Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) had stipulated that in case of public issue, the interest rates on these bonds were not to be less than 50 basis points lower than the yield on government securities of equivalent residual maturity as reported by FIMMDA on the last working day of the month preceding the month of issue of bonds. Also, the same formula was applicable to all categories of investors. So, this year the differential gap between the interest rate for the retail investors and the interest rate for other investors has been increased to 50 basis points.

If the issuer entity has been rated by two rating agencies and their assigned ratings are different, in that case the lower of the two ratings will be applicable to the issuer company and accordingly, the company might be able to offer a higher coupon rate.

In case the issuer company decides to make the interest payments semi-annually, it will have to lower the coupon rate by 15 basis points or 0.15%.

The companies are allowed to issue these bonds either through public issues or private placements. As per the notification, at least 75% of the authorised amount of bonds issued by each entity will have to be raised through public issues. For instance, NHAI and JNPT will have to raise at least Rs. 7,500 crore and Rs. 1,500 through public issues respectively.

The maximum issue size in each tranche of a private placement can only be Rs. 500 crore. In case of public issues, 40% of each such issue will be reserved for the retail investors category.

Last year, these tax free bond issues got a super response and off late, all these bonds have given a very handsome returns to the investors. With the interest rates falling this time around, it seems to me that the bonds already listed on the exchanges would still remain in high demand. Lets see which company comes out with the first bond issue this time.

How to choose a Debt Fund – Factors to consider while Investing

This post is written by Shiv Kukreja, who is a Certified Financial Planner and runs a financial planning firm, Ojas Capital in Delhi/NCR. He can be reached at skukreja@investitude.co.in

In today’s volatile equity markets, investors are increasing their allocation to fixed income investments. But, it is still an untapped market as far as debt fund investments are concerned. Investors here still remain wary of these fund investments as they do not understand where and how their money gets invested and hence, still prefer to park their money in bank fixed deposits.

But, as a matter of fact, in a falling interest rate environment, bank fixed deposits give lower returns as compared to debt funds, especially, market-linked debt-funds. There are a couple of reasons for that, first, whenever the interest rates fall, the banks also cut their deposit rates and second, a fall in interest rates results in an appreciation in the market prices of debt fund holdings.

In the past one year ending 31st October, 2012, debt funds category has generated returns between 8.44% (Gilt Short-Term Funds) and 11.54% (Gilt Medium & Long-Term Funds), with Income Funds, Short-Term Funds, Ultra Short-Term Funds and Liquid Funds generating 10.53%, 10.04%, 9.55% and 9.35% respectively.

So, what are these debt funds and what factors should the investors look out for to get potentially higher returns?

Equity vs. Debt – Like equity funds invest in equity capital of various companies listed on the stock exchanges, debt funds invest in various listed or unlisted debt instruments of such companies. Fundamentally, this way, equity mutual funds become shareholders of these companies and debt mutual funds become the debtors of such companies.

The first step in any debt fund investment is to determine your time horizon and objective of the investment and also to understand what kinds of investments the debt fund makes. You should invest in a fund which is in sync with your investment horizon and risk profile.

Debt fund category has many sub-categories and it is important to understand how each sub-category is different from the other sub-categories.

Here are the sub-categories under the debt fund category and their characteristics:

Gilt Funds – Invest in Government Securities (G-Secs) primarily; Longest Maturity; Highest Duration; typically invest in securities with an average maturity of more than five years

Income Funds – Invest in corporate bonds and/or G-Secs primarily; Long Maturity; High Duration; typically invest in securities with an average maturity of more than three years

Short-Term Funds – Invest in short-term corporate instruments primarily; Short Maturity; Low Duration; typically invest in securities that mature in one to three years

Ultra Short-Term Funds – Invest in ultra short-term corporate instruments primarily; Shorter Maturity; Lower Duration; typically invest in securities with an average maturity of three months to one year

Liquid Funds – Invest in money-market instruments primarily; Shortest Maturity; Lowest Duration; typically invest in securities with an average maturity of less than three months

Fixed Maturity Plans (FMPs) – Invest in fixed maturity corporate instruments primarily; Fixed Maturity

So, if your investment horizon is short and the objective is to earn safe returns then you should not invest in a Gilt fund or an Income Fund as a rise in interest rates could result in negative returns for such funds.

Now, here are the factors that the investors need to consider while choosing a debt fund.

Performance/Returns
We invest in various asset classes to earn potential returns out of them. So, a fund’s past performance becomes the first important factor to be looked at. An investor should check a fund’s returns over different time periods, like six-month returns, one-year returns, three-year returns, five-year returns, returns since inception and returns since the current fund manager has taken over.

But, as with any investment, you need to understand that the returns in fixed income products also represent past performance and there is no guarantee that they will continue to give the same returns.

Making a comparison of the fund’s performance vis-a-vis the performance of other funds in the same category is a very important exercise. It gives you a clear idea how good or bad the fund has been performing. Also, make sure to check only the ‘Growth’ option of all the funds to make a meaningful comparison as different dividend payment dates of different funds would provide an unclear picture for comparison purposes.

Fund Management Team – Experience & Qualifications
Fixed income investing has become a difficult job in a much more complex economic environment and an uncertain yet dynamic interest rate scenario. How well a fund performs primarily depends on how good the fund manager is.

So, an investor must check the fund manager’s experience and qualification and the returns generated by the fund under his/her fund management tenure. A detailed summary of each fund’s management team, its experience and qualifications can be found in the fund’s prospectus.

Also, a fund house well equipped with thorough research and analysis tools in debt fund management will definitely be able to take quick quality decisions as compared to a team with lack of such tools.

Average Time to Maturity
A bond fund carries a weighted average time to maturity, which is the average of the current maturities of all the bonds held in the fund. The longer the average maturity, the more sensitive the fund tends to be to the changes in interest rates.

Duration

Though duration and maturity sound similar, never confuse duration of a bond or a fund with its time to maturity. Duration measures how much a bond’s price will rise or fall with a percentage fall or rise in interest rates and is calculated in a similar manner in which maturity is calculated. A fund with an average duration of 6.74 years (or just 6.74) will theoretically appreciate 6.74% in value with a 1% fall in interest rate, keeping all other factors constant.

Average Yield to Maturity
Yield to Maturity (or YTM) is the annualised rate of return that an investor earns on a fixed income instrument, if the investor purchases the bond today and holds it until maturity. Average yield to maturity of a debt fund is the average of the current maturities of all the bonds held in the fund.

Companies offer higher yields on their debt securities in order to attract common investors like you and me and also to attract the managers of these debt funds. Some fund managers get attracted to these higher yields and compromise on the quality front by investing in lower-quality securities. So, you should not invest in high yield bond funds only on the basis of its potential yield. You need to factor in the credit risk, risk of default associated with the issuers, and how that risk might affect the safety of your investment.

Standard Deviation and Sharpe Ratio
While a debt fund may generate a higher return, the return may be the result of potentially higher risk. Standard deviation calculates the sensitivity of a security or a fund. The higher the standard deviation, the higher the security’s volatility risk.

Sharpe Ratio is an equation to calculate risk-adjusted performance of a portfolio and for a debt fund, it is calculated by subtracting the risk-free rate from the debt fund’s return, divided by its standard deviation.

Sharpe Ratio = (Portfolio Return – Risk-Free Rate) / Portfolio Standard Deviation

The higher the Sharpe Ratio, the better the debt fund has performed after being adjusted for its risk.

Portfolio/Holdings and Credit Quality
Credit quality of a debt investment is the most important factor for any investor. The overall credit quality of a debt fund will depend on the credit quality of the securities in the portfolio. Different debt funds invest in different debt securities with varying degree of credit quality, ranging from risk-free government securities to high-risk corporate securities.

Though credit ratings do not guarantee against any default in payments and are not 100% foolproof either, the relative credit risk of a bond gets reflected in the ratings assigned to them by the independent rating companies such as Crisil, ICRA, CARE, Fitch and Brickwork. Bonds, which are considered to be the safest from credit risk point of view, are given the highest credit rating of AAA. The lower the ratings are for the securities of a debt fund, the riskier the fund becomes for you to invest.

Debt funds which invest in lower-quality securities can potentially deliver higher returns, but will also be vulnerable to some level of default risk both in terms of interest payments as well as principal repayments. So, the investors should choose debt funds with better asset quality.

Expenses/Charges/Fees
A fund charges expenses and fees for managing your investment. These expenses are a certain percentage of the total assets managed by the fund and hence are termed as the “Expense Ratio”. As these expenses are ultimately affect your returns only, the lower these expenses are the better it is for you. But, at the same time, you should focus more on the returns generated by a fund and less on the expenses.

Exit Load
After SEBI’s ban on “Entry Load”, most mutual funds have introduced “Exit Loads” on most of their schemes and that too in different proportions with different applicable time periods. Also, exit load is charged on the investor’s total investment amount i.e. the principal investment amount plus the return generated on it. So, it becomes important for you as an investor to check the exit load before making the investment, as if the investment horizon is short, then the exit load might reduce your overall returns considerably.

Taxation
Short-term capital gain (STCG) in debt funds is taxed as per your applicable income-tax slab, whereas long-term capital gain (LTCG) is eligible for the inflation indexation benefit and is taxed at the lower of the two, either 10% without indexation or 20% with indexation.

Dividend received from the debt funds are tax-free in the hands of its investors as the fund houses are required to deduct and pay dividend distribution tax (DDT) to the tax authorities. Liquid funds or money-market funds are required to pay dividend distribution tax at an effective rate of 27.0375% (25%*1.05*1.03), including 5% surcharge and 3% education cess. Dividend distribution tax for other debt funds is 13.51875% (12.5%*1.05*1.03) effectively.

So, if your investment horizon is less than a year and you fall in the 30% tax bracket, then you should invest in either an ultra short-term fund or a short-term fund and opt for a regular dividend option as the dividend will be tax-free for you and might result in a zero capital gain tax.

To me this is an exhaustive list of factors which you should consider as you decide to invest in debt funds. If you want to suggest some other factors to be considered, then you are most welcome to share them here. If you want to learn more about the fund you’re considering, you need to check the fund’s prospectus or its monthly factsheet.

Interest Payment Dates of Infrastructure Bonds Issued in 2011-12

This post is written by Shiv Kukreja, who is a Certified Financial Planner and runs a financial planning firm, Ojas Capital in Delhi/NCR. He can be reached at skukreja@investitude.co.in
Tax Saving Infrastructure Bonds u/s 80CCF were in high demand last year. As many as twelve infrastructure bond issues came for subscription and many of the investors just kept seeking more information about their investments.

Now the investments are about to complete their first year and many of the investors are now wondering when they will receive the first interest payments and whom to contact in case they do not get it by the due date.

Vivek suggested the other day to write a post carrying the interest payment dates of infrastructure bonds, the same way we had it for the Tax-Free Bonds issued last financial year.

Author: vivek
Comment:
Can you please publish the various interest payment dates for various 80CCF bonds the way you have published for the Tax savings bonds? That way it would be helpful for all of us who have purchased these bonds.

Here is the table carrying the same for all of the infrastructure bonds issued last financial year, in the chronological order of their issue opening dates.

Issue Interest Payment Date Registrar Contact Email

IFCI Series III

December 12

Karvy

022-23420815-20

einward.ris@karvy.com

PFC

November 21

Karvy

040-2342 0815-20

einward.ris@karvy.com

IDFC Tranche 1

December 30

Karvy

040-2342 0815-20

einward.ris@karvy.com

L&T Tranche 1

January 10

Sharepro

022-6772 0300/400

sharepro@shareproservices.com

IFCI Series IV

February 15

Karvy

040-2342 0815-20

einward.ris@karvy.com

REC

February 15

Beetal

011-29961281-3

recbonds@gmail.com

PFS

March 15

Karvy

040-2342 0815-20

einward.ris@karvy.com

SREI

March 22

Link InTime

022-25963838

bonds.helpdesk@linkintime.co.in

L&T Tranche 2

March 25

Sharepro

022-6772 0300/400

sharepro@shareproservices.com

IDFC Tranche 2

March 21

Karvy

040-2342 0815-20

einward.ris@karvy.com

IFCI Series V

March 31

Karvy

040-2342 0815-20

ifcibond@karvy.com

IDFC Tranche 3

March 31

Karvy

040-2342 0815-20

einward.ris@karvy.com

Infra Bonds in Demat Account – If you had taken these Infra Bonds in your demat account, then the company will credit the interest payment directly in your bank account which is presently linked to your demat account.

Infra Bonds in Physical Form – If you had taken these bonds in the physical form, then you must have given a cancelled cheque of your bank account along with your PAN card copy and the address proof. The company will credit the interest payment directly in the same bank account of which you gave the cancelled cheque.

If you have any query regarding any of your interest payment related issues, you can contact the respective Registrar at the contact number or the email id mentioned in the table. If, for any reason, you want to change the bank details in your investments, then also you need to contact the respective Registrar and seek the New Bank Mandate Form.

Once you are ready to send the duly filled form to change the bank details, don’t forget to attach a cancelled cheque leaf and photo ID proof along. Once the details get changed, the Registrar itself will intimate you regarding the change.

How To Review Your ULIP Investments Before Surrendering

This post is written by Shiv Kukreja, who is a Certified Financial Planner and runs a financial planning firm, Ojas Capital in Delhi/NCR. He can be reached at skukreja@investitude.co.in

Do you belong to a group of those people who bought a life insurance policy a few years back expecting it to deliver good returns and are regretting your decision since then cursing the sales executive who sold you a useless policy as the returns have not met your expectations?

If yes, then I’m sure you must have thought of doing something with your policy – either surrendering it or stop paying further premiums for it or consulting a financial advisor to discuss other alternatives before taking a final decision. Whatever you have done since then, I hope this article will help you in making further progress in the right direction.

First of all, there might be different reasons for different investors to explore the option of discontinuing their life insurance policies. Some of them are:

1. Unsatisfactory performance of the current life policy, as it was initially sold to you by a sales executive/relationship manager showing a very rosy picture or you bought it with a very little understanding

2. Not making financial sense to you anymore, as you have become more financially literate now and with better understanding of the markets and the products you have a view that ULIPs are not for you

3. ULIPs are too complicated for you to continue, as you don’t understand the various kind of charges involved in it, where your money is getting invested and other things involved in ULIPs

4. Availability of better investment options like mutual funds, gold or real estate and you have a shorter term horizon to invest

Options available to you

  • Surrender the policy and withdraw the whole of the Surrender Value or Fund Value
  • Stop paying further premiums, withdraw majority of the invested amount, keep the policy running and enjoy the life cover. This option is available only with old ULIPs.
  • Get the policy fully paid-up (in case of traditional policies)
  • Do a self-assessment (be your financial advisor for your investment)
  • Keep paying the premiums as you are convinced ULIPs outperform Mutual Funds in the longer run.

Before we move any further, we first need to understand the various charges attracted by these ULIPs. You can check these charges applicable to your ULIP in the “Sales Benefit Illustration” or the product brochures. A sales benefit illustration illustrates various charges, year by year, for the term of the plan so that you know where your money is exactly going, how much money is deducted as charges and what is finally getting invested. Here is the link to check a sample of a sales benefit illustration:

1. Premium Allocation Charges – These charges account for the initial expenses incurred by the company in issuing the policy e.g. cost of underwriting, medical tests and expenses related to distributor/agent fees. These are deducted upfront from the premium either annually, half-yearly, quarterly or monthly depending on the frequency of the premiums.

2. Mortality Charges – These charges refer to that part of the premium which goes towards the death benefit and are recovered by cancellation of units on a monthly basis.

3. Policy Administration Charges – As the name suggests, these are administrative charges and are recovered by cancellation of units on a monthly basis.

4. Fund Management Charges – These are the charges incurred to manage the investment portion of your premium and vary from fund to fund depending on the percentage of equity component in the fund.

5. Surrender Charges: These charges are deducted for premature surrender/termination of a policy and are capped at 15% from September 1, 2010.

Surrender Value: It is the sum of money an insurance company will pay to the policyholder in the event he/she voluntarily terminates or surrenders the policy before its maturity or the insured event occurring. In other words, it is the amount payable to the policyholder should he/she decide to discontinue the policy and encash it. This cash value is the savings component of most permanent life insurance policies, particularly whole life insurance policies. This is also known as ‘cash value’ and ‘policyholder’s equity’. The life cover provided by a life insurance policy ends with its surrender as it effects a termination of the contract between the insured and the insurer. Surrender Value = Fund Value – Surrender Charges

Fund Value: The value of the investment portion of your life insurance policy is known as Fund Value. Till the time surrender charges are applicable in ULIPs, surrender value is calculated by deducting the surrender charges from the fund value. Fund Value is paid in full once the surrender charges cease to exist, usually 5 years in new ULIPs. Fund Value = Total no. of units under the policy * NAV of the fund chosen

Let us also take a look at the rules that have been there before and after an important date in the history of ULIPs.

Rules governing ULIPs bought before Sept 1, 2010

Lock-in period of 3 years: Policies taken before September 1, 2010 used to have a lock-in period of 3 years only, after which you were allowed to surrender your policy and take away the fund value after getting the surrender charges deducted.

Surrender Charges: Surrender Charges used to continue after the lock-in period of 3 years. In some policies, these charges continue even after 5 years.

Minimum Premiums Payable: Three

Cover Continuance: This feature was available in older ULIPs wherein you were allowed to continue with the policy even after paying premiums only for the first three years. Your money remains invested in your choice of fund option and the mortality charges will be deducted to maintain the life cover. This was due to mis-selling by intermediaries. Life cover continues even after you surrender the policy or stop paying policy premiums.

Charges: Charges are relatively higher.

Rules governing ULIPs launched on or after Sept 1, 2010

Lock-in period of 5 years: The so-called New Ulips, which have been launched on or after September 1, 2010, carry a lock-in period of 5 years i.e. you’ll get the fund value only after 5 years if you’ve paid the premiums for all the 5 years. If you surrender the policy without paying even 5 premiums, then also you’ll get the surrender value only after 5 years but in that case your money will earn only 4% p.a. interest.

Surrender Charges: Surrender Charges cannot be levied after the lock-in period of 5 years if the policy term is 10 years or less and after 6 years if the policy term is more than 10 years. If you surrender after paying only the first premium, the maximum surrender charges as per IRDA can be Rs. 3000 (for premiums up to Rs. 25000) or Rs. 6000 (premium above Rs. 25000).

Minimum Premiums Payable: Five

Cover Continuance: The new ULIPs don’t offer this feature. If you stop paying premiums after the lock-in period, the policy will be discontinued and the value will be returned to you. Life cover ceases once you surrender the policy or stop paying policy premiums. It was one of the best features with the older ULIPs but I fail to understand why it has been removed from the new ULIPs altogether. The agents used it extensively to mis-sell ULIPs by telling their clients that they just need to pay only three premiums and after that they can either withdraw the investment or the life cover will continue even they don’t pay further premiums.

Charges: Charges are relatively lower

What to look for before surrendering your policy – step by step process:

  • Check whether the policy is bought before or after September 1, 2010
  • Check the various charges deducted till date: “Premium Allocation Charges”, “Mortality Charges”, “Policy Administration Charges”, “Fund Management Charges” etc.
  • Check the Surrender Value or Fund Value by making a call to the customer care centre or online logging into your account
  • Check the various charges to be deducted in the forthcoming years and do a self-assessment to decide whether the charges are justifiable for you to continue with the policy
  • Do a background check of the fund manager before you continue with your existing ULIP – who the fund manager is and what is his/her qualification? How long has he/she been in the fund management business and how has been his/her performance history?
  • Compare the performance of the fund vis-a-vis some of the good performing diversified mutual fund schemes over a period of one year, three years, five years and since inception. ULIP returns should be easily available on the company’s website. If the fund is underperforming consistently, you should seriously consider discontinuing the policy.
  • Compare the mortality charges of your ULIP with a good term plan with the same Sum Assured. Newer ULIPs usually carry high mortality charges as they don’t come under the cost caps, which gives insurance companies an opportunity to have a high margin on the mortality cost. It is most likely that the term plan would be offering a cheaper option to cover your life. If that is the case, then I think you should get your ULIP discontinued by encashing the fund value.
  • Take the help of a financial planner in case you are not able to understand the charges or the performance of the funds before taking final decision.

Reasons why you should not surrender your ULIP:

Most of the older ULIPs either carry very high costs in the initial years or have steep surrender charges or both. It is only in the later years that charges become somewhat reasonable and more money gets invested. So it would be a bad idea to surrender ULIPs with high costs in the initial years and a penalty for discontinuance.

There are a few old ULIPs, in which the policies carry surrender charges almost till the end of the policy term. You need to check your policy, the surrender charges involved in it and then decide whether it is worth surrendering or keep the policy till its maturity.

If you have taken one of the old ULIPs, then your life will remain covered even without paying further premiums with the “Cover Continuance” feature. In that case, if the mortality charges of future years are reasonable, then you may stick to your policy and hope the fund is managed in an efficient and professional manner.

As I mentioned earlier, you should not surrender ULIPs if you are convinced ULIPs outperform Mutual Funds in the longer run.

Reasons why you should surrender your ULIP:

There is lack of transparency in almost all sections of their workflow.

Fund managers of almost all ULIPs have failed to deliver and there is no certainty whether they will be able to deliver in the future years also.

Premium Allocation Charges will remain quite high in future years also which eat up a significant portion of your principal investment.

Term plans are the best insurance plans to get your life insured.

It is better to invest in investment avenues like mutual funds, Gold ETFs, PPF etc. or to pay-off any of your loans which carry a higher rate of interest than your ULIPs will deliver.

Documents you need to submit for policy surrender:

  • Policy surrender form – it should be easily available on the company’s website
  • Policy bond
  • A self-attested copy of your ID proof
  • Any cancelled cheque or bank attested bank statement or bank attested passbook copy for fund transfer

I have a personal view that one should never mix his/her investments with insurance. But, if somebody has already done that then the best option is to try not to surrender the policy in a real hurry, keep it alive as long as possible, study all the features and charges of your policy thoroughly and reap the maximum benefits out of it. It is generally advisable that you should wait for a longer period before surrendering your policy, as this will ensure the higher initial charges are spread out. But, if after doing the extensive research, you have decided to surrender the policy, then you should visit the nearest branch office of the company to surrender your policy along with the above mentioned documents.